Programma

• Urban, city, territory and environment concepts
• Evolution of urban planning concept
• Definitions of city, territory, environment and landscape
• History of Urbanism
• Fundamentals of urban law: from the environmental landscape to the structural plan
• Urban tools
• European guidelines for urban regeneration
• Sustainable Development Goals 2030
• Smart City e Smart Planning
• Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan
• Strategic Tourism Plan

Testi Adottati

Astengo, G. Voce “Urbanistica”. Enciclopedia universale dell’Arte. Firenze: Sansoni, 1966, 541-642.
Benevolo, L. (1989). Le origini dell’urbanistica moderna. Bari: Universale Laterza

Manuale di Urbanistica
Codice dell’Edilizia e dell’Urbanistica
European Commission (EC) OIP e SIP 2013
European Commission (EC) Guidelines. Developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. (Linee Guida SUMP Eltis)

Modalità Frequenza

2/3 total

Modalità Valutazione

ORAL EXAMINATION and evaluation of the exercise papersEvaluation criteria: • 30 - 30 cum laude: Good ability to conceive and develop the planning and territorial development process, in an original and reproducible way; ability to formulate original judgments and evaluations; excellent language and communication skills; • 26-29: Comprehensive ability to conceive and develop the planning process with innovative contents; ability to apply acquired knowledge and to formulate judgements; good ability to articulate a specialized discourse also through different communicative registers; • 22 - 25: Sufficient ability to conceive and develop a planning process with elements of innovation; basic ability to apply the acquired knowledge and to formulate judgments, as well as to articulate a specialized discourse; • 18-21: Minimal ability to conceive and develop a planning process with elements of innovation, to apply acquired knowledge and formulate judgements, as well as minimal presentation and communication skills; • Poor: severe difficulties in designing and developing a planning process; strong training gaps; inability to apply the acquired knowledge; inappropriate language

Programma

• Urban, city, territory and environment concepts
• Evolution of urban planning concept
• Definitions of city, territory, environment and landscape
• History of Urbanism
• Fundamentals of urban law: from the environmental landscape to the structural plan
• Urban tools
• European guidelines for urban regeneration
• Sustainable Development Goals 2030
• Smart City e Smart Planning
• Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan
• Strategic Tourism Plan

Testi Adottati

Astengo, G. Voce “Urbanistica”. Enciclopedia universale dell’Arte. Firenze: Sansoni, 1966, 541-642.
Benevolo, L. (1989). Le origini dell’urbanistica moderna. Bari: Universale Laterza

Manuale di Urbanistica
Codice dell’Edilizia e dell’Urbanistica
European Commission (EC) OIP e SIP 2013
European Commission (EC) Guidelines. Developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. (Linee Guida SUMP Eltis)

Modalità Frequenza

2/3 total

Modalità Valutazione

ORAL EXAMINATION and evaluation of the exercise papersEvaluation criteria: • 30 - 30 cum laude: Good ability to conceive and develop the planning and territorial development process, in an original and reproducible way; ability to formulate original judgments and evaluations; excellent language and communication skills; • 26-29: Comprehensive ability to conceive and develop the planning process with innovative contents; ability to apply acquired knowledge and to formulate judgements; good ability to articulate a specialized discourse also through different communicative registers; • 22 - 25: Sufficient ability to conceive and develop a planning process with elements of innovation; basic ability to apply the acquired knowledge and to formulate judgments, as well as to articulate a specialized discourse; • 18-21: Minimal ability to conceive and develop a planning process with elements of innovation, to apply acquired knowledge and formulate judgements, as well as minimal presentation and communication skills; • Poor: severe difficulties in designing and developing a planning process; strong training gaps; inability to apply the acquired knowledge; inappropriate language